The Brooklyn Nets beat the Washington Wizards (let’s go) in a game that nobody should’ve wanted.
Brooklyn entered the bubble without a real shot at the title, trying to stave off the eighth seed by the skin of their teeth with a cavalcade of eighth-stringers.
On Sunday, though, at least they gave us a spot of joy, as well as an all-important reminder.
Yes, there’s nothing quite like the wonderful puns of Ian Eagle on a muggy Sunday afternoon.
Caris LeVert put in a wonderful fourth quarter possessing shades of his 37-point fourth (plus overtime) takeover against the Celtics from five months ago. Joe Harris proved his value from behind the arc (6-of-7!). Besides his 22-15 points-board double-double, Big Jay converted all 10 of his free throws — not bad, considering he’s hitting them at a 62% clip on the year.
But as much as I enjoyed the ephemeral short-term pleasure of watching LeVert teleport me back to his March with his fourth-quarter takeover, I couldn’t help but feel that itch in the back of my throat reminding me not to get too excited.
Such a feeling reminded me of my favorite SAT word from a half-dozen years ago: pyrrhic. A Pyrrhic victory is a victory “that inflicts such a devastating toll on the victor that it is tantamount to defeat. Winning a Pyrrhic victory takes a heavy toll that negates any true sense of achievement or damages long-term progress.”
Think of a triple-overtime thriller where the Nets come out victorious, but by playing through fatigue, a healthy but fragile Kevin Durant aggravates his achilles and has to be held out for two weeks. The victory is delightful, sure, but would you really trade a triple-OT W for two weeks of Kevin Durant?
In the same light: would you trade four playoff games for a first-round pick?
Before Tyler Johnson goes out tweeting that FanSided is hating again, I will present both sides of the argument. My only disclaimer: it’s a tough sensation, rooting against your own team because, deep down, you know it’s in their best long-term interests.